CSS Prepare

compulsory · CSS study notes

Forecast Q5 — The Makkah Defence Alliance and Pakistan

Forecast question: The Makkah Joint Defence Agreement (2026) between Saudi Arabia, Türkiye and Pakistan has been described as a "Muslim NATO". Critically examine its strategic rationale and its implications for Pakistan's foreign policy, especially its relations with Iran. (20)

🎯

Why it is likely: the examiner asked about the Islamic Military Alliance in 2018 ("critically analyse... implications for the Muslim world"), Muslim Ummah unity in 2022, and Saudi–Iran balance in 2024. A new collective-defence pact with Pakistan at its centre, activated in October 2026, fits all three. Probability: high.

What the examiner wants

  • Strategic rationale: why the pact was signed, and what each state brings
  • A critical examination: is it really a "Muslim NATO"?
  • Implications for Pakistan, especially Iran
  • Marks split: context ~3 · provisions and rationale ~5 · "Muslim NATO" critique ~4 · implications for Pakistan and Iran ~6 · conclusion ~2

Outline

  • I. Introduction
  • II. Background: from the 2025 bilateral pact to the 2026 trilateral
  • III. Key provisions
  • IV. Strategic rationale
    1. Eroding trust in the US security umbrella
    2. The Iran war and the Houthi threat
    3. What each state brings
  • V. Is it a "Muslim NATO"?
  • VI. Activation (October 2026)
  • VII. Implications for Pakistan
    • A. Gains
    • B. Risks: Iran, Yemen, India, overstretch
  • VIII. Way forward
  • IX. Conclusion

Model Answer

I. Introduction

  • On 7 August 2026, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, President Erdoğan and PM Shehbaz Sharif signed the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement at Al-Safa Palace, Makkah. Its core clause states that an attack on one is an attack on all.
  • Thesis: the pact is a rational response to a region where US guarantees no longer reassure Gulf states. It brings Pakistan prestige, money and strategic weight. But it is not a NATO: it lacks integrated command and a clear trigger. Its biggest test for Pakistan is staying defensive without breaking with Iran.

II. Background

  • 17 September 2025: the Pakistan–Saudi Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement (Riyadh), the bilateral foundation.
  • 28 February 2026 onward: the Iran war; Iranian missiles and drones hit Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states despite US bases there.
  • April–May 2026: Pakistan deployed aircraft and troops to Saudi Arabia under the bilateral pact.
  • 7 August 2026: Türkiye joins, and the trilateral pact is signed.

III. Key provisions

  • A collective-defence clause (an attack on one is an attack on all), presented as consistent with Article 51 of the UN Charter.
  • Cooperation in defence industry, counter-terrorism and all military domains.
  • Officially defensive, not directed at any country, and not sectarian.
  • It doesn't replace Türkiye's NATO membership or the 2025 bilateral pact.
  • An umbrella agreement, with mechanisms to be built later: a secretariat in Saudi Arabia led by Pakistan's Lt Gen (retd) Nauman Mahmood.

IV. Strategic rationale

  • 1. Distrust of the US umbrella: Gulf states were struck while hosting US forces, and Washington declined Saudi requests for strikes on the Houthis. So Riyadh is hedging.
  • 2. Threat environment: Iranian missiles, Houthi drone attacks, and the risk to the Holy Places.
  • 3. What each state brings:
    • Saudi Arabia: money, energy leverage and geography.
    • Türkiye: NATO's second-largest army and a strong defence industry (drones, ships).
    • Pakistan: a large, battle-experienced military, and the only nuclear-armed Muslim state.
  • For Pakistan: economic support from Riyadh, defence-industrial links with Ankara, and a central role in Muslim security.

V. Is it a "Muslim NATO"?

  • Similarities: collective-defence clause; a political-military committee; a secretariat.
  • Differences:
    • No integrated command or permanent joint forces like NATO's.
    • No automatic response: each step needs political decisions.
    • Only three members, and the Foreign Office said there were no immediate expansion plans.
    • Unclear nuclear dimension: Pakistan hasn't extended a formal nuclear umbrella.
  • The "Sunni bloc" label: officials reject it, but excluding Iran and the pact's anti-Houthi activation feed that perception.
  • Verdict: more a defence partnership in progress than a NATO, with real potential if it builds institutions.

VI. Activation (October 2026)

  • After Houthi strikes on southern Saudi Arabia (September) and reported attempts toward Makkah and Madinah, the alliance's committee met in Riyadh on 5 October 2026 and agreed rapid deployment of agreed forces inside Saudi Arabia.
  • Pakistan's defence minister said Pakistani and Turkish forces are in a supporting role, with only Saudi forces in combat.
  • Legal grey zone: the Houthis are a non-state actor, while the clause was written with attacks by states in mind.

VII. Implications for Pakistan

  • A. Gains
    • Prestige: a Pakistani secretary-general, and Pakistan as a security pillar for the Muslim world.
    • Economy: stronger Saudi financial support, investment (SIFC), energy security and remittances.
    • Defence industry: Turkish technology and joint production.
    • Diplomatic weight in Washington and the Gulf.
  • B. Risks
    • Iran: Tehran may see the pact as aimed at it. Pakistan shares a 900 km border with Iran, needs its cooperation on Baloch militancy, and is the US–Iran mediator. Any combat against Iran or its allies could destroy that role.
    • Yemen entanglement: Parliament's 2015 resolution kept Pakistan out of the Yemen war. Now Pakistani forces are close to that conflict again.
    • Sectarian spillover: a Sunni-bloc perception could inflame tensions at home, as the 2026 protests showed.
    • India: India may see a nuclear-armed Pakistan in a Gulf alliance as a threat, and could deepen ties with Iran and Israel.
    • Overstretch: the Afghan and Indian fronts plus Gulf deployments, on a strained budget.

VIII. Way forward

  1. Keep the pact strictly defensive: air and missile defence, counter-drone and training roles, not offensive operations in Yemen.
  2. Reassure Iran through regular high-level contact, and use the pact's "not against any state" language.
  3. Parliamentary oversight of any deployment, as in 2015.
  4. Use the alliance's weight to push regional de-escalation, including Saudi–Iran and Saudi–Houthi talks.
  5. Turn security ties into economic gains: investment, energy deals and defence production.
  6. Build clear legal rules on non-state attacks and the activation process.

IX. Conclusion

  • The Makkah pact reflects a post-American moment in the Gulf, and puts Pakistan at the centre of Muslim security.
  • It is not yet a NATO, and it shouldn't become a sectarian bloc. If Pakistan keeps it defensive and balanced with Iran, the pact can be a source of strength; if not, it could pull Pakistan into the very wars it has avoided for decades.

Key facts to memorise

  • Bilateral SMDA: 17 September 2025, Riyadh (Al-Yamamah Palace).
  • Makkah Joint Defence Agreement: 7 August 2026, Al-Safa Palace, Makkah; Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, Pakistan.
  • Activation: 5 October 2026 (Riyadh). Secretary-general: Lt Gen (retd) Nauman Mahmood (Pakistan), three years.
  • Legal basis: UN Charter Article 51.

Possible variations

  • Islamic Military Alliance (2018) vs the Makkah pact: compare.
  • How can Pakistan maintain balance between the Gulf and Iran after 2026?
  • Is a "post-American" Middle East emerging?