CSS Prepare

compulsory · CSS study notes

XIV. Foreign Policy of Pakistan Post 9/11

📂 START HERE — How This Page Is Organised

No child pages here — read the sections below in order, then the solved past papers at the end.

📝 Actual CSS questions from this chapter

  • CSS 2016 Q6 — Post-9/11 foreign policy and Pakistan's future role
  • CSS 2018 Q7 — Changing trends in Pakistan–US relations since 2001
  • CSS 2020 Q8 — Pak–US revival and the US–Taliban peace process
  • CSS 2022 Q8 — Mistrust after the US withdrawal from Afghanistan

📺 Directly Relevant YouTube Lecture Sources

📌 Topic Contents

  1. 📖 Immediate Shift (2001)
  2. 📖 Key Themes 2001-2010s
  3. 📖 Post-2010s Realignment
  4. 📖 Post-2021 (Taliban takeover) Era
  5. 📖 Enduring Themes Throughout
  6. 📖 2022–2026: A More Active Foreign Policy
  7. 📖 Argument Bank
  8. 📖 Determinants of foreign policy
  9. 📖 Achievements since 2001
  10. 📖 Failures and criticism
  11. 📖 Balancing the US and China
  12. 📖 Answer Outline (20 marks)
  13. 📖 Exam angle
  14. 📖 ✍️ Model Answer (20 marks)
  15. 📖 Outline
  16. 📖 1. Introduction
  17. 📖 2. Determinants

Exam technique: focus on the command word, relevant evidence, a contrasting view and a reasoned conclusion.

Immediate Shift (2001)

  • U-turn from Taliban support to frontline War on Terror ally under US pressure (Musharraf's "you're with us or against us" moment)
  • Reoriented foreign policy priorities around counter-terrorism cooperation

Key Themes 2001-2010s

  • Heavy dependence on US military/economic aid (Coalition Support Fund)
  • Balancing US alliance with China relationship (which deepened steadily regardless)
  • India relations fluctuated — Agra Summit (2001), Mumbai attacks (2008) setback, periodic peace processes
  • Afghanistan policy tension — accused of hedging via non-state actors (Haqqani network allegations)

Post-2010s Realignment

  • Growing tilt toward China as primary strategic partner (CPEC launched 2015)
  • US-Pakistan trust deficit widened (OBL raid, drone strikes, aid cuts under Trump 2018)
  • Pakistan diversified ties — deepened Gulf relations, explored Russia outreach (rare high-level visits)

Post-2021 (Taliban takeover) Era

  • Policy shift toward "geo-economics" — PM/COAS rhetoric emphasizing trade & investment over strict security alignment
  • Managing complex Afghan Taliban relationship — recognition withheld, but engagement continues
  • Renewed US engagement under changing global priorities (varies by US administration)

Enduring Themes Throughout

  • India-centric security lens persists despite globalized foreign policy rhetoric
  • China as "all-weather friend" — most stable pillar of foreign policy since 2001
  • Balancing act between US, China, Gulf, and regional neighbours remains core challenge

2022–2026: A More Active Foreign Policy

  • National Security Policy (January 2022): first formal NSP, putting economic security at the centre.
  • February 2022: PM Imran Khan in Moscow as Russia invaded Ukraine; Pakistan stayed neutral in UN votes.
  • 2023–24: economic diplomacy through the SIFC (Gulf and Chinese investment), IMF programmes.
  • 2025: US–Pakistan thaw under Trump (Munir's White House lunch, trade deal, minerals cooperation); May 2025 conflict with India; Saudi–Pakistan Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement (September); Bangladesh rapprochement.
  • 2026: mediator in the Iran war (Islamabad Talks); Gaza Board of Peace; conflict with Afghanistan; China-mediated talks.

Argument Bank

Determinants of foreign policy

  • Geography
  • Security environment (India)
  • Ideology and Muslim identity
  • Economy and aid dependence
  • Great-power politics
  • Civil-military balance
  • The diaspora

Achievements since 2001

  • Survived as a frontline state
  • CPEC
  • SCO membership
  • FATF exit (2022)
  • Gulf security partnerships
  • Diplomatic relevance restored by 2025–26

Failures and criticism

  • Reactive and security-driven
  • Dependence on external aid
  • Poor ties with neighbours (India, Afghanistan, at times Iran)
  • Image problem (terrorism)
  • Economic diplomacy underused
  • Policy often shaped by the military rather than Parliament

Balancing the US and China

  • Avoid bloc politics.
  • Keep China as the economic partner and the US as a security and market partner (largest export market).
  • Use mediation roles to stay useful to both.

Answer Outline (20 marks)

  1. Introduction — 9/11 as the defining shift.
  2. Determinants.
  3. Phase 1 (2001–10): frontline ally.
  4. Phase 2 (2011–21): trust deficit, China tilt, CPEC.
  5. Phase 3 (2021–26): geo-economics, diversification, mediation role.
  6. Assessment — achievements vs failures.
  7. Recommendations — economy-first diplomacy, strategic autonomy, neighbourhood policy, parliamentary oversight, soft power.
  8. Conclusion.

Exam angle

  • Use phases: 2001–10, 2011–21, 2021 onwards.
  • Examiners like clear periodisation in foreign-policy answers.

✍️ Model Answer (20 marks)

Question: Critically analyse Pakistan's foreign policy after 9/11 and suggest how it can best serve national interest today.

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Determinants of foreign policy
  3. Phase 1 (2001–2010): frontline ally
  4. Phase 2 (2011–2021): trust deficit and the China tilt
  5. Phase 3 (2021–2026): geo-economics and diversification
  6. Critical assessment
  7. Recommendations
  8. Conclusion

1. Introduction

  • 9/11 changed Pakistan's foreign policy overnight.
  • Over 25 years it moved through three stages:
    • frontline US ally
    • mistrust and a deeper reliance on China
    • more diversified, active diplomacy (2025–26)
  • Thesis: resilient and adaptable, but too often reactive, security-dominated and limited by economic weakness.

2. Determinants

  • Geography
  • The India factor
  • Islamic identity
  • Economic dependence
  • Great-power politics
  • The civil-military balance
  • The diaspora

3. Phase 1 (2001–2010): Frontline Ally

  • The U-turn on the Taliban and cooperation in the War on Terror.
  • Sanctions lifted, aid resumed; major non-NATO ally status (2004).
  • A peace process with India: the composite dialogue (2004–08), derailed by the Mumbai attacks (2008).
  • Growing strategic partnership with China.
  • Costs: militancy at home, sovereignty violations, anti-US sentiment.

4. Phase 2 (2011–2021): Trust Deficit and the China Tilt

  • 2011 crises: Raymond Davis, Abbottabad, Salala.
  • CPEC (2015): China becomes the central economic partner.
  • SCO membership (2017) and outreach to Russia.
  • US aid suspended (2018); FATF grey listing (2018–22).
  • Facilitation of the US–Taliban Doha agreement (2020).
  • Refusal to join the Saudi-led war in Yemen (2015).

5. Phase 3 (2021–2026): Geo-economics and Diversification

  • The National Security Policy (2022) puts economic security at the centre.
  • The Taliban takeover, then conflict with Kabul (2025–26).
  • 2025: US–Pakistan thaw; deterrence restored in the May 2025 conflict with India; the Saudi–Pakistan Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement; renewed ties with Bangladesh.
  • 2026: mediator between the US and Iran (the Islamabad Talks); member of the Gaza Board of Peace; UN Security Council member (2025–26).

6. Critical Assessment

Achievements

  • Survived as a frontline state and maintained nuclear deterrence.
  • Built the China partnership and CPEC while restoring ties with the US.
  • Exited the FATF grey list (2022); joined the SCO.
  • Gained a mediator's stature and deepened security ties with the Gulf.

Weaknesses

  • Reactive and security-driven rather than strategic.
  • Dependence on external aid and loans.
  • Poor relations with most neighbours (India, Afghanistan, at times Iran).
  • Economic diplomacy underused; exports stagnant.
  • Policy often shaped by the military rather than Parliament.
  • An image problem linked to terrorism.

7. Recommendations

  1. Economy-first diplomacy: trade, investment and remittances as the core of foreign policy.
  2. Strategic autonomy: balanced ties with the US and China; avoid blocs.
  3. Neighbourhood policy: crisis management with India; a verifiable security arrangement with Afghanistan; stable ties with Iran.
  4. Middle East neutrality combined with active mediation.
  5. Institutional coherence: parliamentary oversight and a professional foreign service.
  6. Soft power: the diaspora, culture, sport, education and climate diplomacy.
  7. Principled positions on Kashmir and Palestine, pursued through international law.

8. Conclusion

Pakistan's foreign policy since 9/11 has been a story of survival under pressure, and in 2025–26 of renewed relevance. But diplomacy cannot substitute for economic strength. The next phase of Pakistan's foreign policy must turn geostrategic importance into geo-economic gains, so that Pakistan engages the world not as a supplicant or a frontline state, but as a stable, prosperous partner.

📝 CSS Past Papers 2014–2026 — This Chapter (Solved)

📊

Asked so far: 4 subjective questions (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022), three of them on Pak-US relations · 2 MCQs (2020, 2024). A question on Pak-US relations comes roughly every two years. Add the improvement of 2025 to your answers: the trade arrangement, US help with the ceasefire and American interest in Pakistan's minerals.

2024–2026 MCQs are from the FPSC papers with original options. 2014–2023 MCQs come from published answer keys (the FPSC copies only contain Part-II), so their options are rewritten but the keyed answer is kept and checked.

Part-I — Past MCQs

1. (CSS 2020) Pakistan's ambassador to the United States (at the time of the paper) was:

  • (A) Jalil Abbas Jilani
  • (B) Ali Jahangir Siddiqui
  • (C) Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry
  • (D) Asad Majeed Khan
  • ✅ (D) Asad Majeed Khan (Jan 2019–2022).
    • ⚠️ Date-dependent: then Masood Khan (2022–24), then Rizwan Saeed Sheikh (from 2024). Check before the exam.

2. (CSS 2024) Pakistan was re-elected for the seventh time to the UN Committee on Non-Governmental Organizations on:

  • (A) 11 Feb 2022
  • (B) 19 March 2022
  • (C) 17 April 2021
  • (D) 13 April 2022
  • ✅ (D) 13 April 2022 — elected by ECOSOC for 2023–26 (announced 14 April, Pakistan time).
    • The 19-member committee decides NGO consultative status at the UN.

Part-II — Past Subjective Questions

1. CSS 2016 Q6 — Write a note on the post-9/11 foreign policy of Pakistan. What role do you foresee for Pakistan in regional and global politics in the near future? (20)

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Relations with the United States
  3. Relations with Afghanistan
  4. Relations with India
  5. Relations with China
  6. Relations with Russia and Central Asia
  7. Relations with the Muslim world
  8. Pakistan's future role in regional and global politics
  9. Conclusion

Answer

1. Introduction

  • The attacks of 9/11 forced a sudden reversal in Pakistan's foreign policy. A country that had recognised the Taliban government now joined the coalition against it, and security concerns came to dominate its external relations.

2. Relations with the United States

  • Pakistan became a Major Non-NATO Ally in 2004 and received large amounts of aid and Coalition Support Fund reimbursements.
  • Trust broke down in 2011 after the Abbottabad raid and the Salala attack, and American demands to "do more" became a constant irritant.

3. Relations with Afghanistan

  • Pakistan supported the Karzai government but relations remained marked by mistrust over border management, refugees and militant sanctuaries.
  • In 2016 it joined the Quadrilateral Coordination Group with Afghanistan, the United States and China to promote peace talks.

4. Relations with India

  • The composite dialogue began in 2004, and General Musharraf put forward a four-point formula on Kashmir.
  • The process collapsed after the Mumbai attacks of 2008, and the Pathankot and Uri attacks in 2016 froze relations again.

5. Relations with China

  • The "all-weather" friendship deepened through a free trade agreement in 2006 and the launch of CPEC in 2015.

6. Relations with Russia and Central Asia

  • Relations improved steadily. Pakistan became an observer in the SCO in 2005 and a full member in 2017, and it signed a defence cooperation agreement with Russia in 2014.

7. Relations with the Muslim world

  • Pakistan maintained close ties with Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Turkey and Iran.
  • In April 2015 Parliament resolved that Pakistan would stay neutral in the Yemen conflict, showing a more independent approach to quarrels within the Muslim world.

8. Pakistan's future role in regional and global politics

  • Through CPEC and Gwadar, Pakistan can become a hub linking China, Central Asia and the Middle East.
  • It can act as a bridge in the search for stability in Afghanistan.
  • Its membership of the SCO gives it a place in Eurasian integration.
  • It will remain one of the leading contributors to UN peacekeeping.
  • It can speak for Muslim causes through the OIC.
  • It must balance carefully between the United States and China.
  • It has served as a mediator before, between the United States and China in 1971 and between the United States and the Taliban in 2020, and could do so again.

9. Conclusion

  • After 9/11 Pakistan's foreign policy was driven largely by security. Its influence in the years ahead will depend on whether it can shift its focus towards trade and connectivity, and on whether it can achieve stability at home.

Full 20-mark answer: CSS 2016 — Pakistan Affairs Paper (Solved)

2. CSS 2018 Q7 — Discuss the changing trends in Pakistan-US relations since 2001. (20)

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. The alliance years (2001 to 2008)
  3. Strategic dialogue and the Kerry-Lugar-Berman Act (2008 to 2011)
  4. The crises of 2011
  5. Transactional relations (2012 to 2017)
  6. The Trump years (2017 to 2021)
  7. The Biden years and the Afghan withdrawal
  8. The thaw of 2025
  9. Factors behind the changes
  10. Conclusion

Answer

1. Introduction

  • Relations between Pakistan and the United States have always moved in cycles. They grow close when Washington needs Pakistan, as in the 1950s, the 1980s and after 2001, and drift apart once that need has passed. The period since 2001 shows this pattern very clearly.

2. The alliance years (2001 to 2008)

  • Pakistan became a frontline ally in the War on Terror. Sanctions were lifted, it was named a Major Non-NATO Ally in 2004, and it received more than a billion dollars a year in aid and reimbursements.

3. Strategic dialogue and the Kerry-Lugar-Berman Act (2008 to 2011)

  • Under the civilian government, the two countries launched a Strategic Dialogue in 2010.
  • The Kerry-Lugar-Berman Act of 2009 promised 7.5 billion dollars in civilian aid over five years, although its conditions caused resentment in Pakistan.

4. The crises of 2011

  • The Raymond Davis affair in January, the Abbottabad raid in May and the Salala attack in November followed one another in a single year.
  • Pakistan closed NATO supply routes for seven months.

5. Transactional relations (2012 to 2017)

  • Cooperation continued on a limited basis, drone strikes went on and Coalition Support Fund payments were reduced.

6. The Trump years (2017 to 2021)

  • In January 2018 President Trump accused Pakistan of "lies and deceit", and security assistance was suspended.
  • Relations improved once Pakistan helped bring the Taliban to the negotiating table, leading to the Doha Agreement of February 2020.

7. The Biden years and the Afghan withdrawal

  • After the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021, many in Washington blamed Pakistan for the Taliban's victory, and relations cooled.
  • Imran Khan's "absolutely not" on US bases and the cipher controversy of 2022 added to the strain.
  • Some cooperation continued, including support for Pakistan's IMF programme and an F-16 sustainment package in 2022.

8. The thaw of 2025

  • The United States helped broker the ceasefire after the India-Pakistan conflict of May 2025.
  • A trade arrangement with a lower tariff rate for Pakistan followed, along with American interest in Pakistan's minerals.
  • Field Marshal Asim Munir was received at the White House in June 2025.

9. Factors behind the changes

  • Developments in Afghanistan.
  • The growing US partnership with India and Washington's rivalry with China.
  • Concerns about terrorism and nuclear security.

10. Conclusion

  • Since 2001 the relationship has moved from a close strategic alliance to a largely transactional one. It will become stable only if it rests on trade, investment, education and people-to-people ties, not on security alone.

Full 20-mark answer: CSS 2018 — Pakistan Affairs Paper (Solved)

3. CSS 2020 Q8 — Discuss revival of Pak-US relations in context of the present US-Taliban peace process. (20)

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. The low point of 2017 and 2018
  3. Pakistan's role in the peace process
  4. The Doha Agreement
  5. Signs of revival
  6. What each side wanted
  7. Continuing irritants
  8. Prospects
  9. Conclusion

Answer

1. Introduction

  • By 2018 Pakistan-US relations were at one of their lowest points. The search for a settlement in Afghanistan gave the two countries a fresh reason to work together.

2. The low point of 2017 and 2018

  • President Trump accused Pakistan of deceit, security aid was suspended and, with American backing, Pakistan was placed on the FATF grey list in 2018.

3. Pakistan's role in the peace process

  • Pakistan persuaded the Taliban to negotiate directly with the United States.
  • It released the senior Taliban leader Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar in October 2018.
  • It supported the talks led by the US envoy Zalmay Khalilzad in Doha and backed the intra-Afghan dialogue that followed.

4. The Doha Agreement

  • Signed on 29 February 2020, the agreement provided for the withdrawal of US and NATO forces within 14 months. In return, the Taliban promised not to allow Afghan soil to be used for attacks on other countries.

5. Signs of revival

  • Imran Khan met President Trump at the White House in July 2019, where Trump offered to mediate on Kashmir.
  • The US restored military training for Pakistani officers under the IMET programme in December 2019.
  • Trump spoke warmly of Pakistan at Davos in January 2020, and the two sides discussed expanding trade.

6. What each side wanted

  • The United States wanted a safe exit from Afghanistan and continued counter-terrorism cooperation.
  • Pakistan wanted a stable Afghanistan, stronger economic ties, relief from the FATF and some balance against India.

7. Continuing irritants

  • Washington's strategic partnership with India.
  • American criticism of CPEC.
  • US concerns about terror financing and human rights.
  • The risk that Pakistan would be blamed if the peace process failed.

8. Prospects

  • For the improvement to last, the relationship has to extend beyond Afghanistan into trade, investment, energy and education.

9. Conclusion

  • The Afghan peace process brought the two countries back into regular contact. A durable relationship, however, needs an economic foundation of its own, and cannot depend on Afghanistan alone.

Full 20-mark answer: CSS 2020 — Pakistan Affairs Paper (Solved)

4. CSS 2022 Q8 — Discuss the issues and mistrust in US-Pakistan relations after the withdrawal of the US troops from Afghanistan. (20)

Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Issues behind the mistrust
  3. Areas where interests still meet
  4. Way forward
  5. Conclusion

Answer

1. Introduction

  • After the chaotic US withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021, Washington saw much less need for Pakistan. Old grievances on both sides came to the surface and mistrust deepened.

2. Issues behind the mistrust

  • Many American officials and lawmakers blamed Pakistan for the Taliban's victory, and a bill was introduced in the US Senate in 2021 calling for a review of Pakistan's role.
  • In June 2021 Imran Khan publicly ruled out US bases on Pakistani soil.
  • President Biden did not telephone the Prime Minister, which Pakistan saw as a deliberate snub.
  • Washington was uneasy about Pakistan's growing closeness to China and about CPEC.
  • The United States deepened its strategic partnership with India through the Quad and technology agreements.
  • In 2022 the cipher controversy, with its allegation of a US-backed plan to remove the government, inflamed public opinion.
  • Pakistan declined an invitation to the US Summit for Democracy in December 2021.
  • Pakistan wanted American help against the TTP operating from Afghanistan, but Washington's attention had moved elsewhere.

3. Areas where interests still meet

  • Both countries want to contain ISKP and other terrorist groups.
  • In 2022 the United States approved a package of about 450 million dollars for the maintenance of Pakistan's F-16 fleet.
  • It provided relief after the 2022 floods and supported Pakistan's IMF programme.
  • The United States remains Pakistan's largest single export market.
  • There is scope for cooperation on climate change and health.

4. Way forward

  • In line with the National Security Policy of 2022, Pakistan should put trade, IT and energy at the centre of the relationship.
  • It should avoid being drawn into bloc politics between the United States and China.
  • It should make better use of the large Pakistani diaspora in the United States.
  • A regular strategic dialogue should be maintained at senior level.

5. Conclusion

  • After 2021 Washington stopped seeing Pakistan mainly through the lens of Afghanistan and began to see it through the lens of China. Pakistan's task is to build a relationship that can stand on its own economic merits, independent of both.

Full 20-mark answer: CSS 2022 — Pakistan Affairs Paper (Solved)

🧠 Additional Practice Questions — Not Actual FPSC Past Papers

  • "Critically analyse Pakistan's foreign policy after 9/11."
  • "Discuss the determinants of Pakistan's foreign policy and the challenges it faces today."
  • "How can Pakistan maintain balanced relations with the US and China?"