compulsory · CSS study notes
Azm-e-Istehkam
📂 START HERE — How This Page Is Organised
No child pages here — short current-affairs notes in the order below.
- Use inside terrorism answers (CSS 2018 Q5, 2026 Q3).
📺 Directly Relevant YouTube Lecture Sources
- Current Tenure — Coalition Governments (2022–Present) — current tenure: launch of Azm-e-Istehkam (2024)
- Pakistan's Internal Security Situation — Threats to Internal Security — internal security: the TTP resurgence it responds to
- PML-N's Third Term (2013–2018) — PML-N 2013–18: Zarb-e-Azb and NAP, for comparison
📌 Topic Contents
- 📖 Overview
- 📖 Key Features
- 📖 Controversy & Political Reaction
- 📖 Context: Rising Threat
- 📖 Exam Angle
20-mark technique: frame a thesis; explain causes and consequences; substantiate claims; assess alternative explanations.
Overview
- "Azm-e-Istehkam" (Resolve for Stability) — comprehensive national counter-terrorism campaign approved by Pakistan's Apex Committee (National Action Plan forum) in June 2024
- Announced amid resurgence of TTP-linked and ISKP terrorism, especially in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan, following the post-Afghan Taliban takeover (Aug 2021) spike in cross-border militancy
Key Features
- Distinguished from past kinetic-only operations (Zarb-e-Azb 2014, Radd-ul-Fasaad 2017) — framed as a comprehensive, whole-of-nation approach, not purely military
- Combines: renewed military/intelligence-based operations (IBOs) against militant networks, socio-economic development in affected areas, political reconciliation, and diplomatic engagement with Afghanistan on cross-border militancy
- Explicitly links internal security to economic revival — terrorism deters investment (esp. CPEC-related)
Controversy & Political Reaction
- Initial announcement caused public/political confusion — mistakenly perceived by some as a full-scale military operation causing displacement (like Swat 2009); government later clarified it's intelligence-based, not mass displacement-causing
- KP provincial government (PTI-led at the time) raised objections over lack of consultation — became a federal-provincial friction point
- Some analysts view it as rebranding of existing NAP/counter-terror efforts rather than a genuinely new strategy
Context: Rising Threat
- TTP attacks increased sharply post-2021 Taliban takeover of Afghanistan — Pakistan accuses Afghan Taliban of sheltering TTP, denied by Kabul
- Pakistan has conducted cross-border airstrikes into Afghan territory targeting TTP hideouts, straining Pak-Afghan relations
Exam Angle
- High-yield current affairs. Link it to:
- worsening Pakistan–Afghanistan relations
- NAP's implementation gaps
- civil-military and federal-provincial coordination problems
- Likely MCQ: launch year (2024) and its key feature (comprehensive, not only kinetic) compared with earlier operations.