2026 · Q8c · Evolution of public administration (10 marks)

📌

CSS 2026 · Q8(c) · 10 marks (short note) · Topic: Extra · Evolution of Public Administration — Five Paradigms

Same idea asked again: 2022 Q8a (Wilson) · 2026 Q1(12) and Q1(20) MCQs (21st-century PA, New Public Governance)

1. Question

Write short notes on any TWO of the following: a. Causes of globalization b. Challenges of Digital Governance c. Evolution of Public Administration

This page answers (c).

2. What the examiner wants

One page, about 12–15 minutes.
Ancient roots in two lines, then the modern stages with dates and names, ideally Nicholas Henry's five paradigms, then today's direction.

3. Outline

I. Introduction — ancient practice, modern discipline
II. Henry's five paradigms
- A. Dichotomy (1900–1926)
- B. Principles (1927–1937)
- C. PA as political science (1950–1970)
- D. PA as management (1956–1970)
- E. PA as PA (1970 onwards)
III. Major turning points
- A. Behavioural challenge
- B. New Public Administration
- C. NPM, NPS, governance, digital government
IV. Pakistan link
V. Conclusion

4. Model answer

I. Introduction

Administration is ancient: Egypt's irrigation, China's civil-service examinations, Rome's provinces and Kautilya's Arthashastra in the Mauryan state.
The modern discipline began in 1887 with Woodrow Wilson's "The Study of Administration."
Why it grew: the state moved from a security state (order and revenue) to a welfare state (services from cradle to grave), which needed far more administration.
Nicholas Henry (1975) traced its growth through five overlapping paradigms.

II. Henry's five paradigms

Paradigm and years	Main idea	Key names
1. Politics–administration dichotomy (1900–1926)	Politics expresses the state's will; administration executes it	Wilson (1887), Goodnow (1900), White (1926)
2. Principles of administration (1927–1937)	Universal principles of good management	Willoughby (1927), Taylor, Fayol, Gulick and Urwick (POSDCORB, 1937)
3. PA as political science (1950–1970)	PA returns to political science; identity crisis	Waldo
4. PA as management (1956–1970)	PA merged into generic administrative science	Administrative Science Quarterly (1956)
5. PA as PA (1970 onwards)	Independent field with its own focus: policy, public interest, management	NASPAA (1970)

III. Major turning points

Behavioural challenge (1940s):
- Simon (1947) called the principles "proverbs";
- Dahl (1947) said PA must study values, behaviour and culture;
- Mayo's Hawthorne studies showed informal groups matter.
Comparative and development administration (1960s): Riggs showed administration depends on its social setting.
New Public Administration (Minnowbrook, 1968): relevance, values and social equity.
New Public Management (1980s–90s): results, markets and managers (Hood 1991; Osborne and Gaebler 1992).
New Public Service (2000): serve citizens, not customers (Denhardt and Denhardt).
Governance and New Public Governance (2000s): networks of government, business and civil society (Rhodes; Osborne 2006).
Digital government (2010s onwards): data, platforms and automation.

IV. Pakistan link

Colonial ICS tradition of control → 1973 administrative reforms → 2001 devolution → NPM-style bodies and digital services (NADRA, IRIS, Citizen Portal) → Digital Nation Pakistan Act 2025.

V. Conclusion

PA has moved from formal machinery to behaviour, values, networks and data.
The evolution is cumulative: each stage criticised the last but kept its useful core — legality and merit still matter in a digital state.

5. 🎯 CSS Exam Perspective

Must-haves: 1887, Henry's five paradigms with years, Simon's "proverbs," Minnowbrook 1968, NPM, governance.
High-scoring touch: a one-line timeline: 1887 → 1900 → 1927 → 1947 → 1968 → 1991 → 2000 → 2025.
Common mistakes: swapping paradigms 3 and 4; putting NPM before Minnowbrook.
Reuse: answers MCQs on 21st-century PA and New Public Governance.