The Urdu-Hindi Controversy (1867–1947)

🎯

Topic: The Urdu-Hindi Controversy (1867–1947) — Lecture 11 of the Pakistan Affairs series. Covers the origins of the language dispute, the Hindi and Urdu movements, key setbacks (Bengal 1871, the Hunter Commission 1882, UP 1900), the founding of the Urdu Defence Association and Anjuman-i-Taraqqi-i-Urdu, the 1937–39 Congress ministries, and the controversy's role as a root of Muslim separatism and the Two-Nation Theory.

Note: Key dates/figures in this page have been cross-checked against standard reference sources where the lecture's own figures were ambiguous; any residual uncertainty is flagged explicitly.

CSS relevance: 🔥 Extremely high — frequently cited (via Paul Brass and K.K. Aziz) as a foundational cause of Muslim separatism and the Two-Nation Theory; a near-certain essay/short-question topic.

Overview

---

I. Background: One Language, Two Scripts

• Hindi and Urdu are mutually intelligible as spoken languages — nearly identical in pronunciation and vocabulary in everyday speech — but their writing systems are entirely different.
  • Hindi is written in the Devanagari script.
  • Urdu is written in the Perso-Arabic script, in the Nastaliq style.
  • A reader literate in only one script cannot read the other — a genuine mutual illegibility, despite the shared spoken language underneath.
• Urdu developed as a literary/court language under the Delhi Sultans and the Mughals, alongside Persian (the official language of that era); over time Urdu became the language of the court and the elite class.
• When the East India Company arrived, it brought English, which — alongside Urdu — became the official language of northern India from 1837 onward (Persian was displaced as the sole official language at this point).
• By the mid-19th century, Urdu was firmly established as the language of administration, the courts, and the elite in northern India.

---

II. The Controversy Emerges (1867)

• 1867: the British government signalled willingness to consider a demand — raised especially by Hindu communities of the United Provinces (UP, present-day Uttar Pradesh), particularly from Banaras — to give Hindi (in Devanagari script) equal official status alongside Urdu, in courts, administration, and education.
• This announcement triggered the controversy, which would dominate subcontinental politics for the next eight decades, until 1947.
• Core positions:
  • Hindu position: Hindi (Devanagari) should be recognised as the national/official language, given its wider popular use.
  • Muslim position: Urdu (Nastaliq), having long served as the language of administration, courts, and the elite, should remain the official language.

---

III. The Two Movements

The Hindi Movement

• Advocated for the growth and official recognition of Devanagari across northern India.
• Key figures: Babu Shiva Prasad and Madan Mohan Malviya, the driving forces behind the movement's campaign for Hindi's official status.

The Urdu Movement

• Formed in defence of Urdu's position; Sir Syed Ahmad Khan was among its most notable early advocates (see the dedicated Sir Syed/Aligarh Movement notes) — a direct extension of his broader work for Muslim political and cultural interests.

---

IV. Key Setbacks & Events

1871: Bengal — Urdu banned by George Campbell

• Lieutenant-Governor of Bengal, Sir George Campbell, banned Urdu throughout Bengal — in courts, administration, and schools — at the provincial level.
• Hindus regarded this as a major success, which boosted their morale and encouraged efforts to eliminate Urdu in other provinces — including Punjab, Bihar, Sindh, and Awadh (Oudh).

1882: The Hunter Commission

• The Hunter Commission (formally the Indian Education Commission) arrived in India to review and recommend ways to promote English education.
• Hindu organisations saw this as an opportunity, attempting to persuade the Commission that Urdu was a "foreign/alien" language while Hindi was "native," and that education in a native language (Hindi) would benefit Indians more than English.
• Since the Commission's actual terms of reference concerned promoting English, not any local vernacular, this Hindu lobbying effort was not seriously considered and ultimately failed — though it clearly revealed the underlying intent to eliminate Urdu.

1900: Uttar Pradesh — Governor MacDonnell's order

• Anthony (Antony) MacDonnell, appointed Lieutenant-Governor of the North-Western Provinces (UP) around 1900, was widely regarded as pro-Hindu and anti-Muslim in orientation.
• On 18 April 1900, MacDonnell's government issued an order ending Urdu's status as the sole official language, making Hindi (Devanagari) an official language alongside it in UP — a major setback, since UP was then considered Urdu's stronghold.
• By this time, Sir Syed Ahmad Khan had already passed away (1898), leaving a leadership vacuum in the Urdu cause.

---

V. Institutional Responses

Nawab Mohsin-ul-Mulk and the Urdu Defence Association

• Nawab Mohsin-ul-Mulk, then Secretary of the Aligarh College Trust and Sir Syed's most prominent successor in Aligarh Movement leadership (see the Aligarh notes), took up the defence of Urdu after MacDonnell's 1900 order.
• Founded the "Urdu Defence Association" (initially formed as the "Urdu Defence Central Committee," August 1900), using the Aligarh platform to organise resistance and end what Muslims saw as a conspiracy against their language.
• MacDonnell threatened to withdraw government grants to Aligarh College in response to Mohsin-ul-Mulk's activism, treating the Association as an unacceptable political move.
• Mohsin-ul-Mulk resigned his position under this pressure, though he was later persuaded to withdraw his resignation; the friction between the two men remained significant.
• Result of the Muslim response: Urdu regained recognition alongside Hindi as an official language in UP (later reinforced when Sir James La Touche became the new UP Governor, 1902–1907, under whom Urdu fully regained its previous standing in courts and offices) — MacDonnell's restrictive order was effectively reversed in practice.

Anjuman-i-Taraqqi-i-Urdu

• After MacDonnell's tenure ended, Mohsin-ul-Mulk (with the Muhammadan Educational Conference, itself founded by Sir Syed in 1886) established a dedicated body for Urdu's promotion, the Anjuman-i-Taraqqi-i-Urdu ("Organisation for the Progress of Urdu").
• Formally organised as a separate entity in January 1903 (a meeting of the Muhammadan Educational Conference in Delhi), with Thomas Walker Arnold as its first President and Shibli Nomani as its first Secretary.
• Purpose: to counter all future conspiracies/efforts against Urdu, both from Hindu organisations and from British administrative decisions, and to work systematically for the promotion and protection of Urdu across the subcontinent.
• This body went on to render immense services for Urdu's promotion, both before and after Pakistan's creation (continuing today as separate organisations in India and Pakistan).

Maulvi Abdul Haq ("Baba-e-Urdu")

• The third major figure in the Urdu cause, after Sir Syed and Mohsin-ul-Mulk.
• Became Secretary of the Anjuman-i-Taraqqi-i-Urdu in 1912, and led it for nearly 50 years, rendering invaluable, sustained service to Urdu's promotion — both before and after Pakistan's creation — earning him the honorific "Baba-e-Urdu" (Father of Urdu).

---

VI. The 1937–39 Congress Ministries

• Following the Government of India Act 1935 and the 1937 provincial elections, the Indian National Congress won overwhelming majorities in Hindu-majority provinces, forming provincial governments there.
• One of the first actions of these Congress ministries: adopting Devanagari script as the language of administration, and subsequently introducing it into the educational curriculum — effectively stripping Urdu of its official status in these provinces.
• 1937–1939 is remembered as an especially difficult period for Muslims on the language question; the Anjuman-i-Taraqqi-i-Urdu and the broader Muslim community had to work intensively, with significant sacrifice, to restore Urdu's lost status.
• This episode (alongside broader grievances about Congress rule in this period) is frequently cited as a major driver of Muslim political consolidation behind the All-India Muslim League in the years immediately following.

---

VII. Scholarly Assessment

• Paul R. Brass (in Language, Religion and Politics in North India): the Urdu-Hindi controversy was a "critical factor in the development of Muslim separatism" — the controversy taught Muslims that Hindus were unwilling to tolerate Muslim language, culture, or religion, delivering an early, formative lesson in separatism.
• K.K. Aziz (in The Making of Pakistan): argues that linguistic conflict was responsible for the emergence of more than one nationalism in India — i.e., the conflict over language directly fed the emergence of a distinct Muslim national consciousness.

---

VIII. Impact on Subcontinental Politics

1. Dominated Indian politics from 1867 to 1947 — an unusually long-running single issue shaping communal relations across eight decades.
2. Exposed Congress's mindset toward Muslims: the controversy revealed, in stark terms, a broader unwillingness among Hindu/Congress circles to tolerate Muslim linguistic and cultural identity.
3. A major contributing factor to the founding of the All-India Muslim League — part of the broader context (along with the Aligarh Movement) that pushed Muslims toward independent political organisation.
4. Widely regarded as an early root of the Two-Nation Theory: the controversy helped convince Muslim leaders that Hindus and Muslims were fundamentally distinct nations — differing in language, culture, and way of life — a conviction that would culminate in the demand for, and creation of, Pakistan in 1947.

---

Further Reading (References Cited in the Lecture)

• Paul R. Brass, Language, Religion and Politics in North India
• Tariq Rahman, Urdu as a Language of Education in British India
• Christopher King, One Language, Two Scripts: The Hindi Movement in Nineteenth Century North India
• K.K. Aziz, The Making of Pakistan
• Robert King, The Poisonous Potency of Script: Hindi and Urdu
• Anjuman Taraqqi-i-Urdu, A Century of Dedicated Services
• South Asia Analysis Group, the Hindi-Urdu controversy (report)

---

Key Figures at a Glance

MCQ Traps

• Urdu and Hindi share the same spoken form but entirely different scripts (Nastaliq vs Devanagari) — a foundational fact often tested directly.
• 1837, not 1867, is when Urdu (with English) became the official language of North India — don't confuse this with the year the controversy itself began (1867).
• George Campbell's Bengal ban (1871) predates the Hunter Commission episode (1882) and the MacDonnell order (1900) — keep this three-event sequence in order.
• MacDonnell's order was issued 18 April 1900; the Urdu Defence Association (initially "Central Committee") was founded in response, in August 1900 — same year, but the association followed the order, not the reverse.
• The Anjuman-i-Taraqqi-i-Urdu traces its roots to the 1886 Muhammadan Educational Conference, but was formally constituted as a distinct organisation only in January 1903 — a two-stage founding history worth stating precisely; its first Secretary was Shibli Nomani, not Abdul Haq.
• Maulvi Abdul Haq became the Anjuman's Secretary in 1912, not its founder — don't credit him with founding the organisation itself.
• Sir Syed Ahmad Khan had already died (1898) by the time of the 1900 UP crisis — it was Mohsin-ul-Mulk, not Sir Syed, who led the response to MacDonnell.
• The 1937–39 Congress ministries' Devanagari imposition is a separate, later chapter of the same long-running controversy — distinct from the 1867/1871/1882/1900 episodes, and directly tied to the Government of India Act 1935 and the 1937 elections (see the dedicated GoI Act notes for that constitutional background).

---

Model Answer Outline

Q. Discuss the Urdu-Hindi controversy and assess its role in the development of Muslim separatism in the subcontinent.

1. Introduction: the shared spoken language/different script background; the controversy's emergence in 1867 and its 80-year span.
2. The two movements: the Hindi Movement (Shiva Prasad, Malviya) and the Urdu Movement (Sir Syed Ahmad Khan).
3. Key setbacks: Bengal (1871), the Hunter Commission (1882), and the UP crisis (1900).
4. Institutional Muslim response: the Urdu Defence Association (Mohsin-ul-Mulk) and the Anjuman-i-Taraqqi-i-Urdu (Abdul Haq's long tenure).
5. The 1937–39 Congress ministries' language policy, and its impact on Muslim political consolidation.
6. Scholarly interpretation: Paul Brass's and K.K. Aziz's arguments linking the controversy to Muslim separatism and the Two-Nation Theory.
7. Conclusion: the controversy is widely regarded as a foundational episode in the emergence of a distinct Muslim political and national consciousness, feeding directly into the formation of the Muslim League and, ultimately, the demand for Pakistan.

---

Self-Test Questions

1. Explain the linguistic relationship between spoken Hindi/Urdu and their respective scripts.
2. How and when did Urdu rise to become the official/court language of northern India?
3. What triggered the controversy in 1867?
4. Describe the 1871 Bengal episode and its consequences.
5. Why did the Hindu lobbying effort during the 1882 Hunter Commission ultimately fail?
6. What did Governor MacDonnell do in 1900, and how did Mohsin-ul-Mulk respond?
7. Trace the founding history of the Anjuman-i-Taraqqi-i-Urdu, including its key office-holders.
8. What happened to Urdu's official status under the Congress ministries of 1937–39?
9. According to Paul Brass and K.K. Aziz, what role did this controversy play in the emergence of Muslim nationalism?

60-Second Revision

Background: Hindi/Urdu share speech, differ in script (Devanagari vs Nastaliq); Urdu rose as the Delhi Sultanate/Mughal court language; from 1837, Urdu + English become North India's official languages • 1867: UP/Banaras Hindus demand Hindi parity → controversy begins, runs to 1947 • Two movements: Hindi Movement (Babu Shiva Prasad, Madan Mohan Malviya) vs Urdu Movement (Sir Syed Ahmad Khan) • Setbacks: 1871 George Campbell bans Urdu in Bengal (courts/admin/schools) → Hindu momentum spreads to Punjab/Bihar/Sindh/Awadh; 1882 Hunter Commission — Hindus argue Urdu "foreign," Hindi "native," but Commission's mandate was English promotion, so the lobbying fails; 1900 Gov. MacDonnell (18 April) makes Hindi co-official in UP (Urdu's stronghold) — Sir Syed already dead (1898) • Response: Mohsin-ul-Mulk (Aligarh College Trust Secretary) forms Urdu Defence (Central Committee/)Association (Aug 1900); MacDonnell threatens Aligarh's grants, Mohsin-ul-Mulk resigns then is persuaded back; Urdu's status restored, cemented under Gov. La Touche (1902-07) • Anjuman-i-Taraqqi-i-Urdu: rooted in the 1886 Muhammadan Educational Conference, formally constituted January 1903 (1st President Thomas Arnold, 1st Secretary Shibli Nomani); Maulvi Abdul Haq becomes Secretary 1912, serves ~50 years, earns title "Baba-e-Urdu" • 1935 Act → 1937 elections → Congress ministries (1937-39) impose Devanagari, strip Urdu's status in Hindu-majority provinces — a major grievance fueling Muslim League consolidation • Scholarship: Paul Brass calls it critical to Muslim separatism (taught Muslims Hindus wouldn't tolerate their culture); K.K. Aziz says linguistic conflict produced "more than one nationalism" • Impact: dominated politics 1867-1947, exposed Congress's stance toward Muslims, fed the Muslim League's founding, and is regarded as an early root of the Two-Nation Theory

---

Next lecture (per the series): the Indian National Congress — its establishment, constitution, motto, and role in Indian politics.