CSS Prepare

optional · CSS study notes

1.8 Key Names, Dates and Scoring Definitions

⬆️ Back to: 1. Introduction to Gender Studies

🎯

Consolidated scholar and chronology sheet. All core author–year–contribution facts live here once. Refer to this list; avoid copying the timeline across multiple topics.

🧭 Topic Outline — Scholars, Dates and Definitions

  1. Match each thinker to an argument
  2. Distinguish books, concepts and institutional milestones
  3. Use accurate paraphrases instead of uncertain quotations
  4. Select evidence appropriate to the question
  5. Retrieve, apply and verify

Study route: follow the outline through the detailed notes below, then use the application and answer-planning section at the end. These are study headings, not additional official syllabus points.

🧠 Quick revision — key points

  • Remember a scholar with a contribution, not only a date.
  • Use names only when relevant to the question.
  • Paraphrase accurately if you cannot recall an exact quotation.
  • There is no fixed five-mark reward for a definition.
  • Formal definition: A scholarly definition states the meaning and boundaries of a concept. Attribution identifies the scholar or source associated with a particular argument; it does not mean every definition must be a quotation.

📅 One consolidated chronology

YearScholar / eventContribution (one line)
1949Simone de Beauvoir, The Second SexWomanhood is made, not born; woman positioned as "the Other".
1955John MoneyPopularised "gender role" in sexology.
1968Robert Stoller, Sex and GenderSeparated biological sex from psychological "gender identity".
1969–70First Women's Studies courses/programmes (US universities, e.g., San Diego State 1970)Institutional birth of the field from second-wave activism.
1970Kate Millett, Sexual PoliticsPatriarchy analysed as a political system.
1972Ann Oakley, Sex, Gender and SocietyMainstreamed the sex/gender distinction in sociology.
1975Gayle Rubin, "The Traffic in Women"Coined the "sex/gender system".
1986Joan W. Scott, "Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis"Gender as a way of signifying relations of power.
1989Kimberlé CrenshawCoined "intersectionality".
1990Judith Butler, Gender TroubleGender as performative; destabilises the category "woman".

📝 Reusable CSS definition

  • Gender Studies is an interdisciplinary field that analyses how societies construct, organise and give unequal value to masculinity, femininity and other gender identities, and how these interact with class, race, religion, sexuality and the state.

🧪 Worked example — using dates inside an answer

  • "The distinction between sex and gender entered social science through Stoller (1968) and was popularised in sociology by Oakley (1972); Rubin (1975) showed how societies turn biological sex into a hierarchy through a 'sex/gender system'."
  • This one sentence carries three names, three dates and one concept.

🧠 Verified 2024 MCQ recall — scholar/concept connections

  • 2024 · MCQ 4: Judith Butler described gender as performative — correct option C.
  • 2024 · MCQ 5: The initial intersectionality discussion focused on gender and race — correct option A.
  • 2024 · MCQ 19: Gender and masculinity/femininity are socially constructed categories — correct option C.
  • 2024 · MCQ 20: “One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman” — Simone de Beauvoir, option A.

Purpose: connect each thinker to a defensible concept rather than memorising letters alone. Verify against the FPSC 2024 question-paper scan.

🧠 How to use scholars and dates in CSS answers

  • Attach a thinker to an argument: Beauvoir → gendered 'othering'; Oakley → sex/gender distinction; Crenshaw → intersectionality; Butler → performativity. Check the detailed chronology below for exact works and dates.
  • Use a date with a purpose: e.g., 1989 when tracing academic institutionalisation in Pakistan, rather than listing dates without explaining significance.
  • Avoid decorative quotations: one accurate paraphrase that supports a claim is better than a misattributed sentence.
  • Keep this page as a reference: the five FPSC syllabus headings are answered in pages 1.1–1.7. The chronology here supports those answers; it is not an extra FPSC syllabus point.

Recall exercise: Choose any two past-paper questions from 2017 or 2023; identify two scholars or milestones that genuinely clarify the question, and explain why.

🔗 Past-paper practice

Use scholars to strengthen relevant arguments in 2017, 2019 and 2023 questions; names are not a substitute for analysis.

✅ Exam traps and active recall

Common mistakes:

  • Attributing "intersectionality" to Butler (it is Crenshaw, 1989).
  • Confusing The Second Sex (1949) with The Feminine Mystique (1963).

Test yourself:

  • Who coined intersectionality, the sex/gender system and gender identity?
  • What year is Gender Trouble and what does it argue?

✍️ Applied Explanation and CSS Preparation

Use an attribution as an analytical tool

ThinkerContribution to explainMisreading to avoid
Simone de BeauvoirBecoming gendered; woman positioned as the OtherTreating a short quotation as a complete biological theory
Ann OakleySociological distinction between sex and genderEquating social expectations with fixed anatomy
Kimberlé CrenshawIntersecting structures of discriminationSimply counting personal identities
Judith ButlerGender performativity and the reproduction of normsReducing performativity to freely chosen theatrical acting

Evidence card method: record the name, work/year from the existing chronology, one accurate contribution, one application and one limitation. An attribution earns its place by explaining the argument.

Application exercise: for a question about girls' education, choose one conceptual lens and one documented Pakistani institutional example. Explain what each establishes. A university's founding date shows institutionalisation; it does not explain household decisions about schooling.

Recall routine: cover the contributions column and reconstruct it; distinguish the closest competing concept; write a two-sentence application without a quotation. Check exact wording before using quotation marks.

Exam boundary: the chronology supports the syllabus answers; it is not a substitute for an argument. Never invent fixed marks for mentioning a scholar, definition or date.