Model Essay: Women Empowerment in Pakistan — Reality vs Rhetoric

The essay below is written as a candidate would submit it under exam conditions — approximately 1,450 words, with introduction, six body sections and conclusion. A short commentary follows.

---

Pakistan elected its first female prime minister in 1988, three decades before the United States nominated a woman to the same office. It has produced Nobel laureates, Supreme Court justices, fighter pilots, and the heads of major financial regulators. And yet, in the 2024 World Economic Forum Gender Gap Index, the country ranked 145th out of 146 — second from the bottom — with a female labour-force participation rate of just 24%, a literacy gap of nearly twenty percentage points, and an estimated 22 million girls out of school. The distance between Pakistan's symbolic achievements and its structural realities is the central paradox of any honest discussion of women's empowerment in the country. This essay argues that the gap between rhetoric and reality is sustained by a combination of legal under-enforcement, economic exclusion, and social practice — and that closing it requires not new declarations but the patient enforcement of laws that already exist.

The legal record is, on paper, impressive. The 1973 Constitution guarantees equality of citizens under Article 25, prohibits discrimination on grounds of sex under Article 27, and obliges the state under Article 34 to ensure full participation of women in national life. Successive parliaments have legislated the Protection Against Harassment of Women at the Workplace Act (2010), the Anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial) Act (2021), the Women Protection Acts of the four provinces, and the Domestic Violence Acts in Sindh, Balochistan, KP and most recently Punjab. Pakistan has ratified CEDAW (1996) and continues to participate in the international women's-rights architecture. By the measure of statute alone, the country has the legal scaffolding of a society committed to women's empowerment.

The reality of enforcement, however, is starkly different. The 2023 Aurat Foundation Annual Report on violence against women recorded over 4,000 reported cases of rape, 1,100 honour killings, and 2,800 cases of domestic violence — figures that the same report acknowledges as a fraction of the true incidence, given persistent under-reporting. Convictions in rape cases remained below 3% nationally, according to the same data; in honour-killing cases, below 5%. The 2016 Anti-Honour Killing Law removed the legal escape route of family pardon (qisas and diyat) for honour killings, yet the application of that provision has been uneven across districts. A law that is not enforced is, in functional terms, not a law. It is a statement of intent that the state has chosen not to fund.

The second domain in which rhetoric outpaces reality is economic participation. At 24%, Pakistan's female labour-force participation is among the lowest in the world — well below Bangladesh's 43% and India's 33%, and below even Saudi Arabia's recent 33% after the post-2017 reforms. The McKinsey Global Institute estimated in 2018 that closing the gender gap in Pakistani labour markets could add $250 billion to GDP by 2025. That figure was not achieved, in part because the constraints are structural: unsafe public transport, the absence of childcare, segregated workplaces, and a tax-and-benefit architecture that does not reward second-earner participation. Programmes such as the Benazir Income Support Programme (now Ehsaas), and recent provincial initiatives like Punjab's Pink Bus Service and the Sindh Kafalat programme, have moved in the right direction. But none has been scaled to the size of the problem.

The third domain is education. Article 25-A of the Constitution, inserted by the 18th Amendment in 2010, obliges the state to provide free and compulsory education to every child aged five to sixteen. Fourteen years later, 22 million children remain out of school — over 60% of them girls. The Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement Survey for 2019–20 found female primary-school net enrolment at 60% in Balochistan, against 80% in Punjab. Beyond enrolment, retention is the bigger challenge: roughly half of girls who begin Grade 1 do not complete Grade 9, with marriage, distance from school, and household work the leading causes of dropout. The Single National Curriculum and the Tameer-e-School programme have promised reform; the test will be whether construction matches rhetoric.

The fourth domain is political representation. Pakistan reserves 60 of 336 National Assembly seats and 17 of 100 Senate seats for women, in addition to the 33% local-government quota under the 2013 Local Government Acts. By share alone, the country's reserved-seat regime is more progressive than that of several G20 members. But the lived experience of female legislators tells a more complicated story: parties select reserved-seat candidates through party hierarchies that remain overwhelmingly male; women legislators are systematically marginalised from finance, defence and foreign-affairs committees; and the 2018 Elections Act provision requiring at least 5% female candidates on general seats has been observed in form rather than spirit. Representation, in the present arrangement, is broad but shallow.

The fifth domain — perhaps the hardest — is social practice. Laws and quotas address the formal sector. They cannot directly reach the household, the neighbourhood, the in-laws, the qaza panchayat in a remote district. The 2022 Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey found that 28% of ever-married women aged 15–49 had experienced spousal violence; that 21% of women had no say in decisions about their own healthcare; and that the median age at first marriage for women, while rising, remained 20.7 — and below 18 for nearly a quarter of girls in Balochistan and rural Sindh. The Child Marriage Restraint Act (1929, with provincial amendments in Sindh 2014 and Punjab 2015) raised the legal age, but field enforcement in rural districts is sporadic. Social practice changes through television and the schoolroom as much as through legislation; cultural shift is the long horizon on which formal reform must rest.

What, then, is the way forward? Four tracks present themselves. The first is enforcement, not legislation: a dedicated Special Prosecutor for gender-based violence in each province, with caseload-tracking and outcome-publication requirements similar to those of the National Accountability Bureau. The second is economic activation: scaling the Sindh Kafalat and Punjab Sahulat models nationally, expanding skill-development institutes for women (currently NAVTTC has barely 12% female enrolment), and easing female access to formal credit, where women hold only 7% of bank accounts. The third is educational completion, not enrolment: stipend programmes conditional on Grade 10 completion, like Punjab's Zewar-e-Taleem, expanded to Balochistan and southern KP where dropout is highest. The fourth is representation-with-power: reserving for women not just seats but specific committee chairs in finance, defence and foreign-affairs portfolios, on the precedent set by Rwanda and South Africa.

The objection most commonly raised — that these reforms run against "cultural" or "religious" grain — does not survive comparative scrutiny. Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia, Egypt and Saudi Arabia have each accelerated women's economic participation in the last two decades, often from baselines lower than Pakistan's, without sacrificing their cultural distinctness. The Quaid-e-Azam's address at the Aligarh Muslim University on 10 March 1944 — "No nation can rise to the height of glory unless your women are side by side with you" — remains the most-quoted line in Pakistani gender-policy speeches. It would be a long step forward if the next decade's official documents quoted it less and implemented it more.

The gap between rhetoric and reality in women's empowerment in Pakistan is real, measurable, and politically uncomfortable. But it is not unbridgeable. The legal scaffolding exists. The economic returns to closing the gap have been quantified. The international precedents are abundant. What remains is the long, patient business of enforcement, financing and cultural conversation — a business that will outlast electoral cycles and will not generate the headlines that fresh declarations do. The measure of Pakistan's seriousness about women's empowerment in the coming decade will not lie in the speeches its leaders deliver but in the convictions its courts secure, the schools its girls complete, and the bank accounts its women own. Until those lines move, the rhetoric will continue to outrun the reality. And the reality will continue to cost the country far more than it can afford.

---

Commentary on this essay